![117666](https://www.taxation.co.uk/images/default-source/woodwing/117666.png?sfvrsn=8ffa5ab1_2)
Ours not to reason why
Key points
- The definition of ‘food that should not be subject to VAT in 2023’ is effectively based on ‘food that was not subject to purchase tax in 1973’.
- The rules in VATA 1994 Sch 8 Group 1 include seven ‘excepted items’ that are ‘food etc’ but are taken out of zero rating and seven ‘items overriding the exceptions’.
- The most famous VAT case of all is about the difference between a chocolate-covered biscuit (excepted item) and a chocolate-covered cake (excluded in the wording of the excepted item).
- ‘Food for human consumption’ seems fairly uncontroversial but there have been cases about aphrodisiac products edible flowers and aloe gel food supplements.
- Liability of take-away food sold warm – aftermath of George Osborne’s pasty tax Budget.
- Many problems in VATA 1994 Sch 8 stem from a political determination to hold on to the limited permission the UK had to...
Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.