Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Tests indicate employment

04 May 2012
Issue: 4352 / Categories: Tax cases , Employees , Income Tax
Eric Newman Developments Ltd (TC1807)

The taxpayer was a property development and letting business. In 2004 it took on F as a general labourer on a flexible basis.

It was agreed that F would be treated as self-employed. Although it was necessary to supervise his work initially because he was not skilled at the outset it became less necessary as he became more experienced.

He was paid on a weekly basis and received no holiday or sickness entitlement. Each job he undertook was arranged individually with the taxpayer stating the amount that would be paid.

The taxpayer supplied the heavy equipment but F provided his own hand tools. He was covered by the taxpayer’s insurance while working on the taxpayer’s properties.

HMRC disagreed that F was self-employed and issued determinations on the employer stating F was an employee and PAYE and National Insurance should be paid.

The taxpayer appealed.

...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon