Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

An argument of substance

10 August 2010 / Victor Clarendon
Issue: 4267 / Categories: Comment & Analysis , Residence & domicile
VICTOR CLARENDON warns that tax jurisdictions are looking for substance and not just the figment of a tax planner’s imagination

KEY POINTS

  • EU tax law has traditionally required substance the UK’s tax law has not.
  • Internationally different levels of substance are required for different reliefs.
  • How does the position compare for personal corporate and trust taxation?
  • Cases such as Laerstate Davies & Jones and Smallwood can be seen as a move towards substance.
  • Will this move increase in the future?

Businesses have for many years relied upon ‘offshore’ or non-resident structures to reduce or defer taxes and improve returns for UK investors. This has been particularly popular with private equity and real estate structures.

How these structures are managed may however be taking a different turn.

EU case law seems to be asking whether there is a business reason to set up a company in another jurisdiction ...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon