Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Going Dutch

06 October 2009 / Ed Dwan , Lucy Sauvage
Issue: 4226 / Categories: Comment & Analysis , Companies , Residence & domicile
ED DWAN and LUCY SAUVAGE consider the implications of HMRC’s success in the company residence case Laerstate BV

KEY POINTS

  • Where is the company controlled and managed?
  • Effective management means real management.
  • Board meetings must have proper authority.
  • Directors must be kept informed of transactions etc.
  • Relevant documents must be archived properly.

For a number of years we have been aware that HMRC have been keen to obtain some positive tax case precedence in respect of company residence.

Ever since their high profile defeat in 1996 in Untelrab Ltd v McGregor (SpC 55) they have been trying to redress the balance i.e. to demonstrate that maintaining overseas residence for companies where there is a strong UK footprint is not straightforward and on occasion fails.

Initial success at the Special Commissioners in Holden v Wood & Wood was overturned in the High Court and then the Court of Appeal...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon