Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Want of form does not invalidate determination

03 February 2025
Issue: 4971 / Categories: Tax cases
 N Homewood (TC9413)

The taxpayer who represented himself appealed against penalties imposed for the late payment of accelerated payment notices (APNs). He had made representations objecting to the notices but HMRC had replied to the taxpayer confirming the sums due. In the letter HMRC failed to include a reference to the legislation (FA 2014 s 222) or use the words ‘determine’ or ‘determination’.

The taxpayer contended that as a result of this omission the tax payable was not due and no late payment penalties could be levied.

The First-tier Tribunal disagreed. The judge said that there was nothing in the letters to indicate HMRC had not considered his representations. Further it was clear from TMA 1970 s 114(1) that HMRC’s letter confirming the notices did not become invalid because it did not use the word ‘determination’. In any event an assessment or determination was...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

PREPARE YOURPRACTICE FOR 2025: 4 TIPS FOR A SMOOTH TAX FILING SEASON.
Download the exclusive Xero
free report here.

New queries
Please email any questions you might have
to: taxation@lexisnexis.co.uk.

back to top icon