Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

This week's opinion: 12 August 2021

10 August 2021 / Andrew Hubbard
Issue: 4804 / Categories: Comment & Analysis
Meaningless accounting exercise?

What should we make of the disclosure that two government departments (the Department for Work and Pensions and the Home Office) between them had to pay more than £100m to HMRC in back taxes arising from incorrect application of the off-payroll rules? In a future edition we will be publishing an article on the implications of this case for IR35 compliance and the check employment status for tax tool. Here I want to reflect on what many people have seen as the absurdity of one government department having to make a tax settlement with HMRC another part of government. Isn’t this just an accounting exercise with no real meaning?

Such concerns are not new. Readers with access to a full set of tax cases might want to look at CIR v National Coal Board (37 TC 264) where a dispute on a highly obscure point of law...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon