Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Taxpayer’s accounts were riven with inconsistencies

21 June 2021
Issue: 4797 / Categories: Tax cases
K Upadrasta (TC8163)

The tribunal judge set the scene for the appeal in his opening words:

‘Rarely has the quotation “Oh what a tangled web we weave…” been more appropriate. The tortuous and lengthy arguments advanced by the appellant frequently conflict one with the other and some aspects are literally incredible. These appeals are also extraordinary in the sense that the appellant denies absolutely everything including the fact that he attended meetings and had telephone calls with HMRC which are documented.’

The taxpayer placed the burden of proof on HMRC although declined to participate in a hearing. The judge agreed that this lay with HMRC in regard to the discovery assessment and penalties but considered it had discharged this burden.

In short the taxpayer appealed against closure notices a discovery assessment and penalties. HMRC claimed he had understated income from employment self-employment property and bank...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon