Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Relevance of mutuality of obligation

07 July 2020 / Keith M Gordon
Issue: 4751 / Categories: Comment & Analysis
23695
MOOnopoly

For anyone looking at employment status and IR35 it will be difficult to ignore the controversy concerning the concept of mutuality of obligations commonly abbreviated to MOO. It is a widely-acknowledged aspect of employment law when determining a worker’s status and rights. However HMRC expressly ignored it when designing its check employment status tool (CEST) which is intended to assist taxpayers dealing with IR35 challenges in particular ahead of the roll out to the private sector of the revised scheme from next April. HMRC’s official position is that MOO is irrelevant when determining a worker’s status and that its application is limited to ascertaining whether there is a contract in existence at all.

Go – the starting point

When determining a worker’s status the universally-accepted starting point is the decision of Mr Justice MacKenna in Ready...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon