Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Not everything in the notice was reasonably required

24 February 2025
Issue: 4974 / Categories: Tax cases
B Joseph (TC9424)

The taxpayer was employed by a company (ARL). HMRC considered that ARL promoted an avoidance scheme for some of its employees broadly by splitting payments due to the employees into two components – a salary equivalent to the national minimum wage and a commission. It paid PAYE and National Insurance contributions on the first element but not the second.

HMRC issued the taxpayer with a notice under FA 2008 Sch 36 para 1 as it wished to find out whether ARL had paid him sums on which it had not accounted for tax. The taxpayer was not required to submit an income tax return for the year.

The notice asked for information about the employment arrangements such as where he worked the use of intermediaries and what he was told about how the arrangements work.

The taxpayer appealed.

The First-tier Tribunal said the taxpayer’s grounds of...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon