Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

No substitute for clarity in IR35 determination

08 August 2022 / Nikola Nowak
Issue: 4852 / Categories: Comment & Analysis
90060
Focus on clarity

The three key factors of personal service control and mutuality of obligations are still critical to evaluating the hypothetical contract which would exist between the parties if the intermediary (the contractor’s limited company) were removed. In the context of the test of personal service it is important to understand the core differences between subcontracting and substitution.

Precedent

Despite recent tribunal decisions in favour of contractors on the basis that they could demonstrate clear in-business factors (Basic Broadcasting Ltd (TC8400) (9 February 2022) – Adrian Chiles – and Atholl House Ltd v CRC [2022] EWCA Civ 501 – Kaye Adams) these arguments are not going to work for the more traditional contractor working for one end client at a time; and this was emphasised in the fact that the Court of Appeal overturned the Upper Tribunal’s decision in Ms Adams’ case in favour of HMRC.

So we are...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon