Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Is there a lot of phooey over Hoey?

08 August 2022 / Jonathan Hawkes
Issue: 4852 / Categories: Comment & Analysis
90034
Is there a lot of phooey over Hoey?

Readers will have seen recent articles in Taxation concerning the Court of Appeal decision in Hoey and others v CRC [2022] ECWA Civ 656 (see ‘Friday the 13th’ by Matt Hall 2 June 2022 page 8 and ‘Does any reader know an MP?’ by Robert Maas 30 June 2022 page 8).

Both of these articles raised concerns about the lack of review or appeal when HMRC exercised its discretionary power in ITEPA 2003 s 684(7A) retroactively.

In this article I set out some further points that lead me to an alternative view. This is not as an apologist for HMRC or to diminish the issues raised in the aforementioned articles but rather in seeking to engender further debate on what are considered to be some fundamental issues that as tax practitioners and professionals we should all be considering.

Analysing interactions

Let’s look...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon