Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Food for thought?

19 October 2020
Issue: 4765 / Categories: Tax cases
Staatssecretaris van Financiën v X (Case C-331/19), Court of Justice of the EU, 1 October 2020

In the Netherlands a reduced VAT rate is applied to food. X supplied aphrodisiac capsules drops and powders to which it applied the reduced rate on the basis that these items were food. The products were taken orally intended for human consumption and were composed of animal and vegetable matter.

The Dutch authorities challenged this treatment and the matter was referred to the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) for a ruling on what was meant by the word ‘foodstuffs’. It held that the term must be interpreted in accordance with the every-day meaning of language. On that basis it determined that the word meant ‘products containing nutrients which serve as building blocks generate energy and regulate its functions which are necessary to keep the human body alive and enable it to function and develop and which are consumed in...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon