Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Application to amend grounds of appeal refused

02 November 2022
Issue: 4864 / Categories: Tax cases
C4C Investments Ltd (TC8617)

The taxpayer C4C made VAT input tax claims in respect of purchases from DBR Ltd but the latter did not account for VAT. The sole director of DBR was also the operations manager of C4C and had responsibility for VAT compliance for both companies. HMRC denied the claims on the basis that the taxpayer knew or should have known that it was participating in a transaction connected with the fraudulent evasion of VAT. HMRC imposed penalties for deliberate inaccuracies in a VAT return under FA 2017 Sch 24.

The taxpayer appealed saying initially that the level of the penalties imposed should have been lower. However as HMRC’s statement of case noted the taxpayer did not challenge the contention that it had taken part in a fraudulent evasion of VAT or the alleged deliberate inaccuracies in its VAT returns.

As a result the...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon