Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Additional dwelling supplement not repayable because both partners had not owned both properties

16 December 2019
Issue: 4725 / Categories: Tax cases
 J Wallace and L Hogg (FTSTC13)

The taxpayers bought a second property in September 2017. They submitted a land and buildings transaction tax return and paid the additional dwelling supplement due. The first taxpayer Mr W sold his first property which had been his only or main residence in September 2018. The second taxpayer Ms H had never lived in it. The taxpayers claimed repayment of the additional dwelling supplement under Revenue Scotland Tax and Powers Act 2014 s 107.

Revenue Scotland refused the claim so they appealed.

The First-tier Tribunal for Scotland said as conceded by the taxpayers the supplement was due. Further had Mr W been the only buyer of the second property he would have been due a repayment. The problem was that under the legislation Ms H could not qualify for a repayment because she had not disposed of the previous property....

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon