Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Insufficient evidence

05 February 2018
Issue: 4634 / Categories: Tax cases

J Shannon (TC6297)

Business asset taper relief

The taxpayer who was director and shareholder of S sold most of his shares to R a US company He received shares in R in exchange. He sold some of the R shares in 2002-03 and the balance in 2003-04.

The issue concerned whether the taper relief rules (TCGA 1992 Sch A1) applied. If the R shares were business assets the gain would be reduced by 75% after two years’ ownership so that capital gains tax at 10% was due. This depended on whether R was a qualifying company and that in turn depended on whether the taxpayer was an employee of the company. HMRC said he was not. The taxpayer appealed saying R had employed him.

The First-tier Tribunal said under the share purchase agreement the payments by R to the taxpayer were...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon