Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Fair policy

30 October 2017
Issue: 4622 / Categories: Tax cases

The Queen (on the application of R Clarke and others) v CRC, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber), 29 September 2017

Judicial review application on VAT registration

The claimants ran residential care homes. Until 2002 HMRC considered the supplies of the homes’ services as exempt under VATA 1994 Sch 9 Group 7. But in CCE v Kingscrest Associates Ltd and Montecello Ltd (trading as Kingscrest Residential Care Homes) [2002] STC 490 the High Court held that the exemption did not cover supplies by care homes.

As a result HMRC stated in Business Brief 28/04 that care homes did not have to register for VAT in the pre-Kingscrest period because it would remit any output tax for which the care homes were liable on the fees charged to their customers. However a care home could register and complete a single VAT return covering the whole period for which it was unwittingly making taxable supplies pre-Kingscrest.

The taxpayers did not register for VAT but in 2011 a consultancy firm advised...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon