Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

This week's opinion

26 September 2017
Issue: 4617 / Categories: Comment & Analysis

Question of consumer protection needs answers

The decision of the Lord Chancellor not to accept the ICEAW’s application to be designated as an approved regulator and licensing authority for further reserved legal activities will be of interest to readers not least because taxation was one of the key areas covered in the institute’s application. The ruling like the decision a few years ago in the Prudential case about legal advice privilege again brings into sharp focus the fact that the UK tax profession is fragmented not only between lawyers and non-lawyers but also between those who hold an accountancy or tax qualification and those who do not. The ICAEW’s application (I should mention that I am neither a lawyer nor a chartered accountant) failed partly on regulatory grounds but also because the Lord Chancellor had concerns about ‘protecting the interests of consumers’. Consumer protection in tax matters is a topical matter – as the

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon