Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Postponement fail

18 July 2017
Issue: 4608 / Categories: Tax cases , Admin

R (on the application of Dickinson and others) v CRC, Queen’s Bench Division, 7 July 2017

Judicial review application on accelerated payment notices

The taxpayers were in dispute with HMRC over contractor loan agreements that had been notified under the disclosure of tax avoidance schemes (DOTAS) regime. The Revenue said that the loans were taxable income and in early 2014 raised discovery assessments. The taxpayers appealed and applied to postpone the tax charged. HMRC agreed the postponement application. More than a year later in March 2015 HMRC issued accelerated payment notices (APNs) requiring payment of the previously postponed tax. The taxpayers sought judicial review on the ground that the issue of the APNs was an abuse of power in effect reversing the effect of the postponement agreements.

The High Court said parliament had specifically provided that an APN could be issued if HMRC had agreed to postpone the tax. This did not mean the postponement agreements could be ignored rather...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon