Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Scheme fails

05 June 2017
Issue: 4602 / Categories: Tax cases

The Brain Disorders Research Limited Partnership; N Hockin v CRC, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber), 8 May 2017

Claim for capital allowances on research

The partnership was set up to undertake scientific research and claim capital allowances on the relevant expenditure. The partnership paid say £100 to a special purpose vehicle (Numology) to carry out research. A third party verified the £100 as the amount required to undertake the research conventionally. Numology then subcontracted another company BRC to do the work more cheaply paying it say £6. The aim was that although Numology had paid only £6 to BRC the partnership would claim capital allowances on the £100 it had paid to Numology.

HMRC said elements of the scheme were a sham and that only £6 qualified for capital allowances because only that would be spent on scientific research. Further the partnership’s activity for tax purposes was not a trading one.

The First-tier Tribunal dismissed the partnership’s appeal.

The...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon