Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Inadmissible documents

09 May 2017
Issue: 4598 / Categories: Tax cases

S Schechter; L Schechter (TC5677)

Offset trading losses against other income

The taxpayers were shareholders in two companies Vinexsa and Sweet Revenge which held properties in the UK and in France. They argued that as a result of a nominee agreement and a declaration of trust Vinexsa and Sweet Revenge held their respective assets as nominees for the Vinexsa shareholders. They also asserted that a French property owned by Sweet Revenge and one of two London flats owned by Vinexsa were held as trading stock so that trading losses arising from these could be offset against their other taxable income.

HMRC disagreed and the taxpayers appealed.

The First-tier Tribunal first had to decide whether the nominee agreement and the declaration of trust were admissible as evidence. The tribunal noted that both were liable to £5 fixed stamp duty but neither had been presented. Until they were...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon