Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Commercial purpose

04 April 2017
Issue: 4594 / Categories: Tax cases

U-Drive Ltd v CRC, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber), 17 March 2017

Tripartite VAT – was economic reality consistent with contractual position?

The taxpayer U-Drive carried on a vehicle self-hire business. When a car or van was involved in an accident that caused damage to a vehicle belonging to a third party U-Drive would sometimes agree that rather than claiming off insurance it would pay for the repairs. U-Drive contracted with a car repair business to carry out the work; there was no contract between the third party and the repairer. The repairer sent the invoice to U-Drive which it paid.

In September 2013 U-Drive claimed a repayment of VAT incurred on the repairs. HMRC refused it.

The issue was whether the supplies by the repairers were made to U-Drive or to the third parties. If to the former it could deduct VAT.

The First-tier Tribunal dismissed U-Drive’s appeal holding that the repairs...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon