Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Dual-purpose evidence

29 November 2016
Issue: 4578 / Categories: Tax cases

CRC v Infinity Distribution Ltd (in administration), Court of Appeal, 25 October 2016

Missing trader fraud

HMRC appealed against a case management decision of the Upper Tribunal relating to a group of conjoined appeals made by Infinity.

The first appeals – on invalid invoices – arose from HMRC’s refusal to allow Infinity to deduct VAT purportedly paid on taxable supplies to it of mobile phones. This had been on the ground that the invoices did not comply with the VAT Regulations SI 1995/2518 reg 14(1)(g) or (h). In essence they did not contain an adequate description of the goods and of the quantities. HMRC said none of the supplies could have taken place because at the relevant time either none or not enough of the types of phone had not been manufactured or put on the market.

The second appeals – on zero rating – concerned HMRC’s refusal to allow Infinity to zero rate its own supplies of mobile phones....

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon