Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Unreasonable decision

19 July 2016
Issue: 4559 / Categories: Tax cases

P Steady (TC5225)

HMRC’s refusal to suspend a penalty

The taxpayer reported bank interest for 2014-15 in his 2013-14 tax return because the bank had given him the wrong year’s certificate. Neither he nor his accountant noticed the error. After an enquiry HMRC found he had underpaid tax as a result. The same mistake had happened in the previous year but this resulted in an overpayment.

HMRC issued a penalty saying the error was due to carelessness. It refused to suspend the penalty on the ground that the error had arisen because the taxpayer had been careless so there were ‘no specific time bound measurable conditions’ that could be set (FA 2007 Sch 24 para 14).

The taxpayer appealed.

The First-tier Tribunal said HMRC’s decision not to suspend the penalty was flawed and ‘Wednesbury unreasonable’ (this is a decision ‘so unreasonable that no reasonable person acting reasonably could have...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon