Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

No explanation

28 June 2016
Issue: 4556 / Categories: Tax cases

Wholesale Clearance UK Ltd (TC5027)

Best judgment to assess a difference on the company’s accounts

An HMRC compliance officer compared the turnover of the taxpayer’s accounts with the output tax on its VAT returns for the years ending 31 July 2009 to 2011. He raised an assessment for £27 768 because more sales were recorded in the accounts than on the VAT returns. It was reduced to £17 614 because only the final quarter of 2009 was in time under the four-year assessment rule (VATA 1994 s 77). The assessment was raised on the basis of s 73(1) which gives officers the power to ‘assess the amount of VAT due … to the best of their judgment’.

The taxpayer’s accountant was not available to explain the differences to HMRC or the tribunal because of a ‘personal tragedy’ but the tribunal said the Revenue officer had done everything expected of him to produce a...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon