Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Not justified

31 May 2016
Issue: 4552 / Categories: Tax cases

P Brookes v CRC, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber), 6 April 2016

Penalty for dishonest behaviour

The taxpayer set up a property development company and submitted VAT repayment claims. In 2005 after a VAT visit HMRC asked for invoices to support the claim. The taxpayer asked the contractor to send copies of the invoices. The copies were on the taxpayer’s evidence to the First-tier Tribunal (TC2762) ‘useless’ but he passed them on to HMRC.

HMRC imposed a penalty under VATA 1994 s 60 on the basis that the company had tried to obtain a VAT repayment dishonestly. Under s 61 the penalty could be recovered from a director of the company if the dishonesty was attributable to them. The First-tier Tribunal ruled that the taxpayer must have realised that in submitting invoices which he knew to be useless he was behaving dishonestly and upheld the penalty. The taxpayer appealed.

The issue was whether the...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon