Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

No violation of human rights

26 April 2016
Issue: 4547 / Categories: Tax cases

Walapu v CRC, Queen’s Bench Division, 23 March 2016

Judicial review on an accelerated payment notice

The taxpayer sought a judicial review of an accelerated payment notice for £106.8m. He claimed the notice was unlawful because HMRC had not yet made a formal assessment of the tax due. He also said the legislation was retrospective and that the lack of right of appeal against a notice breached his right to a fair trial.

Mr Justice Green in the High Court said although there was no right of representation before a notice was issued it did apply before it took effect. The retrospection was justified but he pointed out that the notice did not change the basis for the imposition of tax – it simply changed the time when payment had to be made.

The notice did not deprive the taxpayer of his property by demanding the tax; should the dispute be resolved in the taxpayer’s favour...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon