Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Curious result

01 March 2016 / David Kirk
Issue: 4540 / Categories: Comment & Analysis , Compliance
istock_000009012509_la_fmt

Background to the First-tier Tribunal decision in Fab Cleaning Management.

KEY POINTS

  • Penalties imposed for incorrectly completed end-of-year returns.
  • Tribunal said the forms reflected the tax paid.
  • Read the legislation on penalties.
  • HMRC’s systems should have discovered the incorrect PAYE deductions sooner.

 

In his editorial ‘Full of surprises’ Andrew Hubbard mentioned the Fab Cleaning Management case and the unexpected (to him) result of applying the correct penalty test.

As the adviser who represented the taxpayer it will be useful to provide further background to the case.

 

Reminder of the facts

The taxpayer company had used the wrong tax codes resulting in an underpayment of PAYE over three years. HMRC as well as determining the additional tax (which was agreed) levied penalties under FA 2007 Sch 24 para 1 for filing inaccurate P14 and P35 end-of-year returns.

The taxpayer’s appeal...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon