.png)
.png)
Why the Anthony Hardy case is important to every practitioner who completes a tax return
KEY POINTS
- A straightforward case and soon dismissed but important implications.
- A deposit was lost because a contract could not be completed.
- The lost deposit was claimed as a deduction from other gains.
- TCGA 1992 s 28 could not be used in support of the loss claim.
- The meaning of an “interest in land” under the new FA 2015 Sch 7.
It would be easy to ignore the recent case of Anthony Hardy (TC4444). Mr Hardy represented himself the First-tier Tribunal noted that the “factual matrix is simplicity itself” and it had no difficulty in dismissing the taxpayer’s contentions in short order.
However for the practitioner who advises clients on capital gains tax the case is of huge importance. Not only does it address...
Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
