Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Incompatible legislation

31 March 2015
Issue: 4495 / Categories: Tax cases , Admin , Business , Partnerships , Self assessment

J Dyson (TC4336)

The taxpayer formed a partnership with W for a year. W was the representative partner and filed the business’s 2012/13 return on paper on 21 May 2014.

HMRC issued each partner with a £100 late-filing penalty daily fines amounting to £900 and a charge of £300 for the return being more than six months late.

The taxpayer appealed against the daily and six-month penalties. The Revenue argued he had no right of appeal because he was not the representative partner as required by FA 2009 sch 55 para 25.

The matter proceeded to the First-tier Tribunal which agreed with the tax department that only the representative partner or his/her successor had the right of appeal.

The judge referred to article 6(1) of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) which states “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon