S Corbett (TC3435)
The taxpayer was an employee of Optivite a company of which her husband was director. She held 1 500 shares.
She was removed from the payroll in February 2009 to help negotiations with another business Kiotech which wanted to buy Optivite. Her husband’s pay was increased by the amount of her former salary.
The taxpayer continued to carry out her duties until Optivite was sold in October 2009. She included a claim for entrepreneur’s relief in her 2009/10 tax return on the disposal of her shares.
HMRC refused on the basis she had not been employed by the company for the whole year ending with its sale (TCGA 1992 s169I(6)(b)).
The taxpayer appealed explaining she had been taken off the Optivite payroll because Kiotech had a policy of not employing directors’ wives. The First-tier Tribunal accepted the reason.
The judge was also satisfied that Optivite...
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.