Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Artwork is wasting asset

04 April 2014
Issue: 4447 / Categories: Tax cases , Inheritance Tax

CRC v Executors of Lord Howard of Henderskelfe (deceased), Court of Appeal

Lord Howard of Henderskelfe died in 1984. He had owned a painting by Sir Joshua Reynolds that had been on display since 1950 in Castle Howard owned by Castle Howard Estate Ltd.

Lord Howard’s executors sold the painting in 2001 and claimed that the gain from the disposal was exempt under TCGA 1992 s 45 on the basis it was a wasting asset.

HMRC refused the claim saying the artwork was not plant. The First-tier Tribunal dismissed the executors’ appeal. The Upper Tribunal overturned that decision. The Revenue appealed.

The Court of Appeal said only items used in a trade profession or vocation could constitute plant under s 44 – but nothing in the section justified the conclusion that the only person benefit under the legislation was the one who had used the asset or the trader in whose business the plant was used.

Section...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon