Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Correct test applied

21 January 2014
Issue: 4436 / Categories: Tax cases , VAT

Else Refining and Recycling Ltd v CRC, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)

The taxpayer company had for many years been in the business of refining and recycling electronic equipment.

It began exporting mobile phones and other electronic products in May 2005 following an approach from one of its main suppliers of second-hand mobile phones.

HMRC refused the taxpayer’s claim for input tax of £234 442.39 – in relation to five transactions for the periods 07/06 and 08/06. The department said the deals were connected with the fraudulent evasion of VAT and the taxpayer should have been aware of the deception.

The First-tier Tribunal dismissed the taxpayer’s appeal accepting that the company had not known about the fraud but holding that the firm should have known.

The taxpayer appealed to the Upper Tribunal claiming the First-tier Tribunal had applied the wrong test.

The Upper Tribunal decided that the First-tier Tribunal had applied the correct test. Some aspects of reasoning were...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon