Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Schematic headache

26 November 2013 / Mark Ackrill
Issue: 4430 / Categories: Comment & Analysis , Admin , Investigations

The result of Mehjoo prompts advice for fledgling tax advisers

KEY POINTS

  • Are accountants and tax advisers competent to deal with all tax matters?
  • The importance of the practitioners understanding the limits of their competencies.
  • Are the ongoing implications of previous tax planning exercises fully understood?
  • Keeping clients aware of tax payment dates and the effects of not making payment.
  • Do engagement letters explain the limits of advice and the effective dates?

The case of Mehjoo v Harben Barker [2013] EWHC 1500 (QB) earlier this year prompted a thought-provoking debate about what can or should be expected of a reasonably competent accountant when advising clients on tax matters.

Contrary to the widespread sensationalist “news” headlines at the time the crux of this case did not concern an obligation on accountants to help their clients avoid tax.

Instead it was...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon