Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Qualifying purpose

13 September 2013
Issue: 4420 / Categories: Tax cases , Business , Capital allowances

Lloyds TSB Equipment Leasing (No 1) v CRC, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)

The taxpayer a finance leasing company claimed capital allowances in respect of its expenditure on two ships which had been built to transport natural gas from Norway to Spain and the USA.

HMRC refused the claim saying the effect of CAA 2001 s 123 was that the taxpayer was not entitled to the allowances. The First-tier Tribunal allowed the taxpayer’s appeal.

The matter moved to the Upper Tribunal where the main issue was as whether or not the taxpayer was entitled to capital allowances at 25%.

The tribunal decided the ships were used for a qualifying purpose within s 123(1) saying the qualifying test could be satisfied even “if the operating costs are not entirely met by the ship operator”.

Looking at the restriction in s 123(4) the tribunal said “all that s 123(4) requires is that a main object of a...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon