Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Grandfather Styles

30 April 2013 / Alistair Godwin
Issue: 4400 / Categories: Comment & Analysis , Business , Capital allowances

Revisiting an old tax case concerning the difference between income and capital expenditure

Whether expenses are of a revenue or a capital nature is a familiar question.

A correct answer is important because in general expenses of a revenue nature are deductible when calculating business profits whereas those of a capital nature are not (the main exception being corporate expenditure on intangible fixed assets like goodwill which may be deductible despite being capital).

Correct identification of a receipt as revenue in nature can therefore result in a lower tax bill for the individual or company concerned.

The Styles case

An issue that arises in practice concerns the treatment of the acquisition of trading contracts: are the purchase monies deductible expenditure? This question was considered as long ago as 1887 in The City of London Contract Corporation v Styles 2 TC 239.

There the Corporation was incorporated as a vehicle to acquire as...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon