Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Question of awareness

29 January 2013
Issue: 4388 / Categories: Tax cases , Admin
CRC v Charlton, Corfield and Corfield, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)

During 2006/07 the three taxpayers entered into an avoidance scheme involving life assurance designed to create allowable losses to offset against capital gains.

The arrangements were reported to HMRC under the disclosure of tax avoidance schemes (DOTAS) regime. The department allocated a scheme reference number that the taxpayers included in their tax returns for the year.

As a result of the Court of Appeal’s decision against the taxpayer in Drummond v CRC [2009] STC 2206 which involved a similar scheme the Revenue decided the scheme in the instant case was ineffective and raised discovery assessments.

The taxpayers appealed.

The First-tier Tribunal allowed the appeal on the basis the HMRC officer who dealt with the returns should have acted upon the scheme reference number. Although there had been a discovery within TMA 1970 s 29(1) the conditions in s 29(5) were not satisfied.

HMRC appealed.

...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon