Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

More evidence required

03 September 2012
Issue: 4369 / Categories: Tax cases , Admin
J Cox (TC2084)

The taxpayer was late in submitting her 2010/11 tax return and in paying the capital gains tax due. HMRC imposed a surcharge and penalty against both of which she appealed.

The First-tier Tribunal judge Geraint Jones QC referred to the European Court of Justice decision in Jussila v Finland [2009] STC 29 saying it was the responsibility of the Revenue to prove the surcharge and fine were due.

In this instance the taxpayer was unable to say how late the return had been filed but the taxman had not attempted to fill in the missing details.

The statement of case said the return was dated 8 January 2011 but it had been date stamped as received on 28 March 2011.

HMRC said the taxpayer had not provided proof that the return had been submitted before 28 March but Mr Jones remarked she...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon