Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Don't rely on others

09 August 2012
Issue: 4366 / Categories: Tax cases , VAT
Gemini Riteway Scaffolding Ltd (TC2053)

The taxpayer company was subcontracted to provide scaffolding for halls of residence at two universities. Haymills and Leadbitters were the main contractors.

In December 2007 HMRC visited the taxpayer and found it had not accounted for VAT on supplies made to the contractors because neither had included VAT in the self-billed invoices they issued retrospectively to the subcontractor.

The VAT officer advised the taxpayer that although the hire of scaffolding must be standard rated supplies of erection and dismantling of scaffolding should be zero rated when the project was the construction of a university hall of residence. A fair and reasonable apportionment was required.

The advice was incorrect: under VATA 1994 Sch 8 group 5 zero rating only applies where such services are supplied ‘in the course of construction’. Only the main contractor makes supplies in the course of construction a subcontractor does...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon