Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

The last word

22 November 2011 / Jonathan Levy
Issue: 4331 / Categories: Comment & Analysis , Gaines-Cooper , IR20 , Residence & domicile
Care should be taken when relying on HMRC’s published guidance, warns JONATHAN LEVY

KEY POINTS

  • Could the IR20 guidance be relied on?
  • Impact of HMRC’s settled practice.
  • Statements must be unequivocal.
  • Obtain an advance ruling.

The Supreme Court by a majority of four to one has dismissed both appeals in the jointly heard judicial review cases of R (Davies and another) v HMRC; R (Gaines-Cooper) v HMRC [2011] UKSC 47 on 19 October 2011.

These were appeals against an earlier decision by the Court of Appeal to refuse applications for judicial review in relation to HMRC’s interpretation of what was IR20 ‘Guidance on residence’.

The judgment

The lead judgment was given by Lord Wilson who began by setting out the facts of the two cases. Mr Davies had challenged HMRC’s finding that he had been...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon