Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

The association

21 June 2011
Issue: 4309 / Categories: Forum & Feedback , Companies
A company that owns a business park lets part of the site to another company. No rent is charged because the companies would be associated if it was

I act for two companies that are associated. Company A has acquired a business park and lets parts of the site out on a commercial basis and allows Company B (a fully trading company) to occupy the major part of the site on a rent-free basis. If Company B paid rent Company A would be a close investment company although this is not the reason why rent is not charged.

It seems that there should be a tax problem with this arrangement but I cannot think of one.

Readers’ thoughts are welcomed and I would appreciate comments on the tax implications and any pitfalls.

Query 17 813 – Rossi

Reply from PKIB

We are told that Company A has acquired a business park and parts of the site are let out on a commercial basis ...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon