Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Some expenses allowed

23 February 2011
Issue: 4293 / Categories: Tax cases
Icebreaker 1 LLP v CRC, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)

Icebreaker 1 LLP was formed in February 2004 to conduct a trade of film distribution. In April 2004 six individuals joined the partnership contributing capital of £1.52 million between them 70% of which had been funded by non-recourse loans advanced by Bank of Scotland.

The partnership submitted its tax return claiming most of its expenditure as a trading loss for the period. HMRC opened an enquiry into the return and eventually issued a closure notice reducing Icebreaker 1’s losses from £1 491 816 to £11 900.

The partnership appealed.

The First-tier Tribunal concluded that most of the losses claimed were not allowable and dismissed the appeal.

The partnership appealed.

The Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) said TA 1988 s 74(1)(a) made clear that only sums wholly and exclusively laid for the purposes of the trade...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon