Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Deductions dismissed

14 December 2010
Issue: 4285 / Categories: Tax cases , Income Tax
Peter Gamble (TC815)

The taxpayer was employed as a sales executive at different times with different employers. His place of work in each case was his home but he was sometimes required to attend the company’s office and had to visit customers both in the UK and abroad.

He was provided with a laptop but used his own mobile phone and home office equipment including a personal computer fax and printer.

In his 2005/06 tax return the taxpayer claimed more than £17 200 as allowable expenses. HMRC disputed the claim so the taxpayer appealed.

The First-tier Tribunal found that in respect of the expenses claimed in respect of his London room rent phone and internet palm computer and fixed phone expenses the taxpayer was not entitled a deduction because the expenses had not been incurred under ITEPA 2003...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon