Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Crossed lines

07 December 2010
Issue: 4284 / Categories: Forum & Feedback , Business , Income Tax
The director/shareholder of a one-man limited company has a mobile phone contract in his own name but which is used for business purposes

My client operates his business through a limited company of which he is the sole employee director and shareholder.

He has a mobile phone the contract for which is in his own name but which is used for business purposes.

The monthly charge for the phone is paid by the company but the HMRC inspector is now seeking to disallow the service charge – which he equates to a rental charge for the phone – while allowing a proportion of the call costs. Is this correct?

I know that in times gone by the Inland Revenue disallowed the rental element of home telephone lines on the basis that all homes had a telephone anyway so this was private but I had it in mind that there had been a recent change of practice here.

Am I correct in that regard or did that only apply...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon