Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

A little learning

31 August 2010 / Mike Truman
Issue: 4270 / Categories: Comment & Analysis , Employees , Income Tax
The case of Goldberg demonstrates why proper representation is so important, says MIKE TRUMAN

KEY POINTS

  • Contractual PILON is taxable as general earnings ITEPA 2003 s 62.
  • Non-contractual PILON should get £30 000 exemption ITEPA 2003 s 403.
  • Leading cases of EMI Group Electronics Ltd and SCA Packaging.
  • Goldberg decided without reference to contractual entitlement – seems questionable.

I really hope I am wrong about this case (TC628). I don’t have a lot of sympathy for Mr Goldberg who the First-tier Tribunal said ‘muddied the waters’ in his evidence about the date a letter setting out his terms of employment was sent and the terms on which he left that employment.

It is also rather foolish to argue a case in person about a tax repayment where some £12 000 of tax...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon