Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Availability rather than intent

03 September 2009
Issue: 4222 / Categories: Tax cases , VAT
Alex Paton & Son (TC 47), John Andrew Thomas Faith (TC 81), Robert & Lillian Waddell (TC 140)

Farmers in three recent cases have tried to reclaim VAT on cars which they argued were for business purposes only.

In Alex Paton & Son HMRC disallowed the taxpayer’s claim to VAT on a Land Rover Discovery.

The taxpayer appealed to the tribunal on the grounds that the vehicle was used solely for a business purpose and had been especially adapted to allow for the taxpayer’s disability.

The main issue to be addressed however was not one of purpose but of availability. The relevant legislation VAT (Input Tax) Order SI 1992/3222 articles 7(2E)(a) and 7(2G)(b) demand that the vehicle is not only for the purpose of business use only but is also incapable of private use.

Crucially article 7(2G)(b) says:

‘A taxable person shall not be taken to intend...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon