Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Stay the night

19 May 2009
Issue: 4206 / Categories: Forum & Feedback
With the subject of MPs’ expenses very much in the news, a reader asks whether the fact that an inner London MP does not need an overnight allowance means that other MPs cannot satisfy the ‘necessarily’ criteria

ITEPA 2003 s 292 exempts MPs’ liabilities in respect of overnight expenses allowance.

Subsection (2) explains that overnight expenses allowance means additional expense ‘necessarily’ incurred in staying away from an only or main residence to perform parliamentary duties in London or the member’s constituency.

The general rules as they relate to employees’ expenses (and as can be found in HMRC’s Employment Income Manual at EIM31645) establish that ‘necessarily’ means an expense that’s imposed on each and every holder of that employment.

So if an MP representing an inner London constituency and living in inner London has no additional expenditure because they don’t stay away overnight from their inner London residence would this question all the other MPs’ ability to claim overnight expenses allowance because they can’t meet the ‘necessarily’ criteria?

Query 17 401 – KMC

Reply by Mark Lee chairman TaxAdviceNetwork.co.uk

Given recent revelations in the...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon