Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Not specific

17 March 2009
Issue: 4198 / Categories: Tax cases , VAT
CRC v The Raj Restaurant and others, Court of Session, 30 December 2008

A succession of companies were registered for VAT but HMRC concluded that these were shams and that the business was in fact being run by four members of a family in partnership.

The department registered the partnership for VAT and assessed them to VAT and penalties covering seven years.

The taxpayers appealed. The VAT tribunal refused the appeal against the registration and this was accepted by the taxpayers.

Another differently constituted VAT tribunal heard the appeal against the assessments and decided in favour of the taxpayers.

HMRC appealed.

The Court of Session ruled that as neither the VAT assessment nor penalty assessment related to any prescribed accounting period in respect of which the respondents had to make a return they were invalid.

The taxpayers were required to make quarterly returns and had to be assessed accordingly.

If HMRC considered a single return for the entire period was necessary...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon