Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Glimmer of hope

21 January 2009 / John Newth
Issue: 4190 / Categories: Comment & Analysis , IR35 , Employees , Income Tax
JOHN NEWTH considers the determination in Castle Construction (Chesterfield) Ltd

KEY POINTS

  • HMRC claimed bricklayers were employees of the contractor.
  • The use of the word ‘employer’ in the contract.
  • Badges of trade.
  • The ‘overall picture’ test.

The Special Commissioners’ decision in Castle Construction (Chesterfield) SpC 723 is unusual in a number of respects.

First the case was taken by the contractor not the individual worker or workers.

Second this was not an IR35 case regarding status instead it determined whether individual workers of a construction company were employees or self-employed subcontractors. It was not a test case but a case decided on its own facts.

Nevertheless the Special Commissioner Howard Nowlan found the case very difficult to decide and this is reflected in a determination that runs to 29 pages.

A by-product of his approach was that he considered and...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon