Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Best advice?

09 January 2008
Issue: 4140 / Categories: Forum & Feedback

My client, a 75 year old widow, recently sold her business for over £1 million. She used £250,000 to purchase a house in joint names with her son James. She does not live in the house, which is occupied by James and his children. My client did not wish to buy the house in James' sole name due to his history of financial mismanagement and failed relationships. I believed that this was not a bad way forward as at least £125,000 would be a potentially exempt transfer.

My client a 75 year old widow recently sold her business for over £1 million. She used £250 000 to purchase a house in joint names with her son James. She does not live in the house which is occupied by James and his children. My client did not wish to buy the house in James' sole name due to his history of financial mismanagement and failed relationships. I believed that this was not a bad way forward as at least £125 000 would be a potentially exempt transfer.

My client recently had a meeting with an independent financial adviser recommended by her solicitor and subsequently received a letter from him which started 'I am fully authorised to advise on the areas covered within this letter'. He then went on to say that 'in the case of James' house you are a co-owner of this...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon