Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Feedback

12 October 2006
Issue: 4079 / Categories: Forum & Feedback , HMRC powers
The Low Incomes Tax Reform Group; the benefits of filing by Internet; the importance of retaining completion statements; and increasingly adversarial relationships with HMRC.

Low Incomes Tax Reform Group

I have read the summary of the proposals for unrepresented appellants (Taxation 28 September 2006 Update page 700). As a sole practitioner representing a number of not-so-well-off small business clients I am concerned that these proposals while no doubt designed to eliminate unfairness would simply introduce unfairness of a different sort.
It is argued that unrepresented appellants should be able to rely on the decision of the first tier being final in most cases so that they are protected against an adverse cost order should the Revenue choose to appeal the decision: unrepresented taxpayers therefore have an advantage over represented taxpayers who will remain liable to that risk. I doubt that any of my clients could afford the cost of a Revenue appeal either.
It is further argued that the unrepresented appellant should receive 'independent professional advice'....

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon